Difference between revisions of "File:EP-D1.4-Fig5B-Bornholm-Bremerhaven.jpg"

From
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Alexander Zilliacus moved page File:EP-D1.4-Fig6-.jpg to File:EP-D1.4-Fig5B-Bornholm-Bremerhaven.jpg: Corrected numbering.)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Summary ==
 
== Summary ==
 
Figure 6: Height profiles of the LIDAR data are wavelength corrected to 630nm using an Angstrom Coefficient of 1.6 measured by a sun photometer in Lindenberg. The linear correlation CAPS vs LIDAR shows an linear factor of 0,79 which is corrected in this plot. This factor is caused by the humidity effect on scattering.
 
Figure 6: Height profiles of the LIDAR data are wavelength corrected to 630nm using an Angstrom Coefficient of 1.6 measured by a sun photometer in Lindenberg. The linear correlation CAPS vs LIDAR shows an linear factor of 0,79 which is corrected in this plot. This factor is caused by the humidity effect on scattering.
 +
 +
[[Category:Images]]

Latest revision as of 07:20, 7 September 2020

Summary[edit]

Figure 6: Height profiles of the LIDAR data are wavelength corrected to 630nm using an Angstrom Coefficient of 1.6 measured by a sun photometer in Lindenberg. The linear correlation CAPS vs LIDAR shows an linear factor of 0,79 which is corrected in this plot. This factor is caused by the humidity effect on scattering.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current05:20, 7 September 2020Thumbnail for version as of 05:20, 7 September 2020663 × 1,173 (103 KB)Alexander Zilliacus (talk | contribs)Figure 6: Height profiles of the LIDAR data are wavelength corrected to 630nm using an Angstrom Coefficient of 1.6 measured by a sun photometer in Lindenberg. The linear correlation CAPS vs LIDAR shows an linear factor of 0,79 which is corrected in thi...
  • You cannot overwrite this file.