Difference between revisions of "List of ENVRIplus Use Cases"
(→Use Case List) |
m |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | = | + | =Background= |
The first ENVRIplus week discussed various use cases which potentially could serve to provide the project work packages a better understanding of user and infrastructure requirements and to test solutions. Interesting cases depend on two or more research infrastructures. The lists below were collected for the work packages in theme 2, but should preferable also applicable for other themes. The cases are split in three groups with each a specific purpose as clarified below. | The first ENVRIplus week discussed various use cases which potentially could serve to provide the project work packages a better understanding of user and infrastructure requirements and to test solutions. Interesting cases depend on two or more research infrastructures. The lists below were collected for the work packages in theme 2, but should preferable also applicable for other themes. The cases are split in three groups with each a specific purpose as clarified below. | ||
− | + | ==Scientific use cases (SC)== | |
− | * | + | *A highly visible frontier research project, dependent on several RI services |
− | * | + | *Researchers should be willing to serve as a guinea pig: secure the researchers engagement |
:{|class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ffffff;" | :{|class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ffffff;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | + | !ID | |
− | + | !Case | |
|- | |- | ||
|SC_3 | |SC_3 | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | + | ==Test cases (TC)== | |
− | * | + | *Test if cooperating RIs potentially can implement ENVRIPLUS solutions |
− | * | + | *Interesting tests cover instrumentation, data, workflows, and training |
:{|class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ffffff;" | :{|class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ffffff;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | + | !ID | |
− | + | !Case | |
|- | |- | ||
|TC_2 | |TC_2 | ||
− | |[[Euro-Argo data subscription service]] | + | |[[TC_2 EuroArgo Data Subscription Service|Euro-Argo data subscription service]] |
|- | |- | ||
|TC_4 | |TC_4 | ||
− | |[[Sensor registry]] | + | |[[TC_4 Sensor Registry|Sensor registry]] |
|- | |- | ||
|TC_16 | |TC_16 | ||
− | |[[Description of a National Marine Biodiversity Data Archive Centre]] | + | |[[TC_16 Description of a national marine biodiversity data archive centre|Description of a National Marine Biodiversity Data Archive Centre]] |
|} | |} | ||
− | + | ==Implementation case (IC)== | |
− | * | + | *Follows from the requirements analysis (= RI expectations from ENVRIPLUS) BOTH ENVRIPLUS and RIs have to invest in the actual implementation |
:{|class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ffffff;" | :{|class="wikitable" style="background-color:#ffffff;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | + | !ID | |
− | + | !Case | |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_1 | |IC_1 | ||
− | |[[Dynamic data citation, identification & citation]] (ICOS, ANAEE, IAGOS (Francios Andre), LTER (Barbara Magagna) | + | |[[IC_1 Dynamic data identification|Dynamic data citation, identification & citation]] (ICOS, ANAEE, IAGOS (Francios Andre), LTER (Barbara Magagna) |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_2 | |IC_2 | ||
− | |[[Provenance Implementation case]] | + | |[[IC_2 Provenance implementation|Provenance Implementation case]] |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_3 | |IC_3 | ||
− | |[[User support to re-process data using their own algorithms (EISCAT 3D)]] | + | |[[IC_3 Support EISCAT-3D users to reprocess data using user's algorithms|User support to re-process data using their own algorithms (EISCAT 3D)]] |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_8 | |IC_8 | ||
− | |[[Cataloguing, curation, provenance]] across RIs WP8 | + | |[[IC_8 Catalogue, curation, provenance|Cataloguing, curation, provenance]] across RIs WP8 |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_9 | |IC_9 | ||
− | |[[Provenance - use of DOI for tracing of data re-use]] | + | |[[IC_9 Quantitative accounting of Open Data use|Provenance - use of DOI for tracing of data re-use]] |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_10 | |IC_10 | ||
− | |[[Domain extension of existing thesauri]] | + | |[[IC_10 Domain extension of existing thesauri|Domain extension of existing thesauri]] |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_11 | |IC_11 | ||
− | |[[Semantic Linking Framework]] | + | |[[IC_11 Semantic Linking Framework|Semantic Linking Framework]] |
|- | |- | ||
|IC_12 | |IC_12 | ||
− | |[[Implementation of ENVRI RM for EUFAR and LTER]] | + | |[[IC_12 Implementation of ENVRI RM for EUFAR and LTER|Implementation of ENVRI RM for EUFAR and LTER]] |
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:ENVRIplus]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Use Cases|0]] |
Latest revision as of 12:52, 26 August 2020
Contents
Background[edit]
The first ENVRIplus week discussed various use cases which potentially could serve to provide the project work packages a better understanding of user and infrastructure requirements and to test solutions. Interesting cases depend on two or more research infrastructures. The lists below were collected for the work packages in theme 2, but should preferable also applicable for other themes. The cases are split in three groups with each a specific purpose as clarified below.
Scientific use cases (SC)[edit]
- A highly visible frontier research project, dependent on several RI services
- Researchers should be willing to serve as a guinea pig: secure the researchers engagement
Test cases (TC)[edit]
- Test if cooperating RIs potentially can implement ENVRIPLUS solutions
- Interesting tests cover instrumentation, data, workflows, and training
ID Case TC_2 Euro-Argo data subscription service TC_4 Sensor registry TC_16 Description of a National Marine Biodiversity Data Archive Centre
Implementation case (IC)[edit]
- Follows from the requirements analysis (= RI expectations from ENVRIPLUS) BOTH ENVRIPLUS and RIs have to invest in the actual implementation
ID Case IC_1 Dynamic data citation, identification & citation (ICOS, ANAEE, IAGOS (Francios Andre), LTER (Barbara Magagna) IC_2 Provenance Implementation case IC_3 User support to re-process data using their own algorithms (EISCAT 3D) IC_8 Cataloguing, curation, provenance across RIs WP8 IC_9 Provenance - use of DOI for tracing of data re-use IC_10 Domain extension of existing thesauri IC_11 Semantic Linking Framework IC_12 Implementation of ENVRI RM for EUFAR and LTER